SDF Dissolution and the Final Integration Deal: What Damascus Gained and What Remains Unclear
On the latest SDF-Damascus integration agreement:
- As SDF commander Mazloum Abdi announced the formal dissolution of the SDF, new details are emerging about the final and more granular aspects of the agreement reached yesterday.
- The most notable is that Abdi finally caved and accepted moving to Damascus to become an adviser to Ahmed al-Sharaa. This is probably one of the more significant details.
- Abdi initially said one of his main post-SDF tasks would be to return among his people and work with Kurdish political forces to establish a new political umbrella, while also floating some form of new political structure. But al-Sharaa has pushed for him to be in Damascus to “work together and manage the process.” This is very important because one of al-Sharaa’s key goals appears to have been breaking the geographic connection, and physically working in Damascus will make Abdi’s co-optation much smoother.
- The overall appointments are less significant than the initial rumours. Abdi was previously discussed for a position as high as vice president or senior presidential adviser, while Ilham Ahmed was seeking the post of deputy foreign minister. Ahmed is now set to become a member of parliament, while Abdi will be one of several presidential advisers, with the extent of his authority unclear. This makes the appointments much more favourable to Damascus because, on the one hand, having them physically in Damascus helps break their territorial continuity, while on the other, their appointments avoid simply reassigning them to positions equivalent to their previous roles and thereby prevent the creation of parallel authority.
- However, there is an upside for Abdi and Ahmed. Being close to the centres of decision-making might help them become more well-versed in statecraft and broaden their strategic thinking. This has been one of the key weaknesses of Syrian Kurds, who have historically been concentrated in smaller rural areas and have therefore had less capacity for elite reproduction or for developing an intellectual ecosystem capable of rivalling the centre.
- The future of Hasakah province and the extent of integrated SDF personnel will likely be concentrated more heavily around the areas where the former SDF brigades are being based, rather than across the entirety of the former SDF pocket. The agreement established three SDF-derived brigades in the Hasakah military structure, while Abdi identifies them specifically as the Derik, Qamishli and Hasakah brigades. According to reliable sources, additional Damascus-appointed security personnel are set to enter Hasakah in the coming days, and once uniforms and vehicle markings are unified, it will become more difficult to distinguish newly recruited personnel that Damascus can deploy in these mixed areas. The broader direction is already clear: Interior Ministry units have progressively entered both Hasakah and Qamishli under the integration arrangements.
- On Kurdish in education and the broader language discussions, there is still no final agreement on the wider question. Reports that Kurdish will become an official state language appear misleading, confusing Kurdish entering an official educational track with Kurdish becoming an official state language alongside Arabic. The latter would require constitutional and legal changes; Ahmad al-Hilali has explicitly said that Arabic remains Syria’s only official language under the current framework. On education, the immediate arrangement is Kurdish as an optional subject for two weekly classes, while the former Autonomous Administration curriculum is subject to a transitional process before the move toward a unified national curriculum.
- Finally, one of the biggest unknowns is the long-term future of this agreement, and this is probably its most important unresolved aspect. The current agreement addresses the integration of SDF personnel now, but does not publicly specify whether, for instance, in two years Damascus can recruit additional personnel into the currently SDF-populated brigades in Hasakah, whether it can replace Interior Ministry personnel integrated from the SDF, or whether, in three years, the governor of Hasakah must still be an SDF-linked figure or can be replaced. None of this is addressed in the publicly available agreement. It is unclear whether there are undeclared clauses, but the absence of such guarantees in writing significantly weakens the long-term prospects of what the SDF is banking on: remaining as cohesive blocs within the security and civilian institutions.





